API integration & workflow automation.
2Site builds API integrations between your systems so data flows automatically instead of being copied by hand: orders, stock, invoices and customer data move on their own between shop, inventory management and accounting. With workflow automation and AI where it genuinely helps.
- The same data gets typed into two systems, twice
- Orders are copied by hand into accounting or inventory
- Your day contains export and import loops that eat hours
- Mistakes happen because manual steps get skipped or rushed
- Two tools you rely on simply have no connection to each other
Systems that talk
I link your tools through their interfaces so data flows instead of being copied.
Recurring work removed
Steps that used to be manual run on their own, reliably and traceably.
Automation with judgment
AI for sorting, drafting and matching where it helps, always with a human in the loop.
Built to keep running
Error handling, logging and monitoring, so problems surface early instead of silently.
Which systems you run, which steps are manual today and where it hurts most.
I trace the data flow and define what should run on its own from now on.
The connection is built and tested against real data, not assumptions.
It goes live with monitoring. When one of your tools changes, I am reachable.
Examples from real projects, not a requirement. I connect what you already run.
An API integration is a programmed connection between two or more applications so they exchange data automatically. Typical results: orders land in accounting on their own, stock stays consistent everywhere, customer data exists only once. It is also called system integration.
It depends on how many systems are involved, how well their APIs are documented and how many edge cases exist. A single connection costs considerably less than middleware between four systems. After the first call you get an honest estimate.
Almost anything with an API, webhook, database or structured export: shop systems, inventory, accounting, CRMs, marketplaces and custom software. The tool names matter less than the flow behind them.
That is the common case and where most of my integration work lives. I build custom connections through APIs, webhooks or scripts so two systems that have no native link still talk.
Yes, where it makes sense: drafting texts, matching records, sorting incoming data. I keep a human in the loop and say honestly when simple logic beats AI.
I build with logging and monitoring so problems surface early rather than silently, and I stay reachable to fix them quickly.
No. The point is to keep what works and connect it. I adapt to your stack instead of forcing you onto new software.
Data flows are a data protection topic, so I plan them transparently: only what is needed flows, everything is logged traceably, and on request the whole processing runs on European infrastructure.